0.03/0.13	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.03/0.14	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.14/0.35	% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
0.14/0.35	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.14/0.35	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.14/0.35	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.14/0.35	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.14/0.35	% CPULimit   : 960
0.14/0.35	% WCLimit    : 120
0.14/0.35	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 06:41:31 EDT 2022
0.14/0.35	% CPUTime    : 
0.21/0.48	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.21/0.48	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.21/0.48	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.21/0.49	eprover: eprover: Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.21/0.49	Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.21/0.49	eprover: Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.21/0.49	eprover: Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 600s (5) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting sh2lt with 120s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 120s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 120s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# sh2lt with pid 24392 completed with status 0
0.21/0.50	# Result found by sh2lt
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 600s (5) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting sh2lt with 120s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.21/0.50	# ...ProofStateSinE()=1/1
0.21/0.50	# Search class: HGUSF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
0.21/0.50	# partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting ehoh_best6_lambda with 73s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# ehoh_best6_lambda with pid 24403 completed with status 3
0.21/0.50	# Starting ehoh_best_sine with 13s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# ehoh_best_sine with pid 24407 completed with status 0
0.21/0.50	# Result found by ehoh_best_sine
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 600s (5) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting sh2lt with 120s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.21/0.50	# ...ProofStateSinE()=1/1
0.21/0.50	# Search class: HGUSF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
0.21/0.50	# partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting ehoh_best6_lambda with 73s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# ehoh_best6_lambda with pid 24403 completed with status 3
0.21/0.50	# Starting ehoh_best_sine with 13s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.21/0.50	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.21/0.50	
0.21/0.50	# Proof found!
0.21/0.50	# SZS status Theorem
0.21/0.50	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_22, type, epred1_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_23, type, epred2_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_24, type, epred3_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_25, type, epred4_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_26, type, epred5_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_27, type, epred6_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_28, type, epred7_0: $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_29, type, epred8_0: $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_30, type, esk1_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_31, type, esk2_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_32, type, esk3_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_33, type, esk4_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_34, type, esk5_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_35, type, esk6_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_36, type, esk7_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_37, type, esk8_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_38, type, esk9_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_39, type, esk10_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_40, type, esk11_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_41, type, esk12_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_42, type, esk13_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_43, type, esk14_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_44, type, esk15_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_45, type, esk16_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_46, type, esk17_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_47, type, esk18_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_48, type, esk19_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(cTHM120H_pme, conjecture, ?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:((((![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o]:(((X1 @ X2 @ X4)<=((X1 @ X3 @ X4)&(X1 @ X2 @ X3))))&![X5:$i > $o, X6:$i > $o]:((((X1 @ X5 @ X6)&(X1 @ X6 @ X5))=>((X5)=(X6)))))&![X2:$i > $o]:((X1 @ X2 @ X2)))&~((X1 @ (^[X7:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[X8:$i]:(~($true))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM120H_pme)).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:((((![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o]:((((X1 @ X3 @ X4)&(X1 @ X2 @ X3))=>(X1 @ X2 @ X4)))&![X5:$i > $o, X6:$i > $o]:((((X1 @ X5 @ X6)&(X1 @ X6 @ X5))=>((X5)=(X6)))))&![X2:$i > $o]:((X1 @ X2 @ X2)))&~(X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM120H_pme])])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X16:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((((((X16 @ (epred4_1 @ X16) @ (epred5_1 @ X16))|(X16 @ (epred2_1 @ X16) @ (epred3_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred6_1 @ X16) @ (epred6_1 @ X16))|(X16 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true)))))&((X16 @ (epred5_1 @ X16) @ (epred4_1 @ X16))|(X16 @ (epred2_1 @ X16) @ (epred3_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred6_1 @ X16) @ (epred6_1 @ X16))|(X16 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))))))&(((epred4_1 @ X16)!=(epred5_1 @ X16))|(X16 @ (epred2_1 @ X16) @ (epred3_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred6_1 @ X16) @ (epred6_1 @ X16))|(X16 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))))))&((((X16 @ (epred4_1 @ X16) @ (epred5_1 @ X16))|(X16 @ (epred1_1 @ X16) @ (epred2_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred6_1 @ X16) @ (epred6_1 @ X16))|(X16 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true)))))&((X16 @ (epred5_1 @ X16) @ (epred4_1 @ X16))|(X16 @ (epred1_1 @ X16) @ (epred2_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred6_1 @ X16) @ (epred6_1 @ X16))|(X16 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))))))&(((epred4_1 @ X16)!=(epred5_1 @ X16))|(X16 @ (epred1_1 @ X16) @ (epred2_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred6_1 @ X16) @ (epred6_1 @ X16))|(X16 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true)))))))&((((X16 @ (epred4_1 @ X16) @ (epred5_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred1_1 @ X16) @ (epred3_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred6_1 @ X16) @ (epred6_1 @ X16))|(X16 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true)))))&((X16 @ (epred5_1 @ X16) @ (epred4_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred1_1 @ X16) @ (epred3_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred6_1 @ X16) @ (epred6_1 @ X16))|(X16 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))))))&(((epred4_1 @ X16)!=(epred5_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred1_1 @ X16) @ (epred3_1 @ X16))|~(X16 @ (epred6_1 @ X16) @ (epred6_1 @ X16))|(X16 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true)))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_3, plain, ![X24:$i]:(((epred8_0 @ X24)<=>((($true))!=(($true))))), introduced(definition)).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X23:$i]:(((epred7_0 @ X23)<=>($true))), introduced(definition)).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((((X1 @ epred7_0 @ epred8_0))=(($true)))|((epred4_1 @ X1)!=(epred5_1 @ X1))|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3]), c_0_4])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X42:$i]:(((~(epred8_0 @ X42)|((($true))!=(($true))))&(((($true))=(($true)))|(epred8_0 @ X42)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred2_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1))|(((X1 @ epred7_0 @ epred8_0))=(($true)))|((epred4_1 @ X1)!=(epred5_1 @ X1))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3]), c_0_4])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred2_1 @ X1))|(((X1 @ epred7_0 @ epred8_0))=(($true)))|((epred4_1 @ X1)!=(epred5_1 @ X1))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3]), c_0_4])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ epred7_0 @ epred8_0)|((epred5_1 @ X1)!=(epred4_1 @ X1))|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X41:$i]:((epred7_0 @ X41)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X7:$i]:((~((epred8_0 @ X7))|~(($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred2_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ epred7_0 @ epred8_0)|((epred5_1 @ X1)!=(epred4_1 @ X1))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred2_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ epred7_0 @ epred8_0)|((epred5_1 @ X1)!=(epred4_1 @ X1))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (((epred8_0)=(epred7_0))|((epred5_1 @ $eq)!=(epred4_1 @ $eq))|((epred3_1 @ $eq)!=(epred1_1 @ $eq))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_9])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X7:$i]:((epred7_0 @ X7)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X7:$i]:(~((epred8_0 @ X7))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (((epred3_1 @ $eq)=(epred2_1 @ $eq))|((epred8_0)=(epred7_0))|((epred5_1 @ $eq)!=(epred4_1 @ $eq))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_12])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, (((epred2_1 @ $eq)=(epred1_1 @ $eq))|((epred8_0)=(epred7_0))|((epred5_1 @ $eq)!=(epred4_1 @ $eq))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_13])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred5_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred2_1 @ X1))|(((X1 @ epred7_0 @ epred8_0))=(($true)))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3]), c_0_4])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, (((epred5_1 @ $eq)!=(epred4_1 @ $eq))|((epred3_1 @ $eq)!=(epred1_1 @ $eq))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]), c_0_15]), c_0_16])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (((epred3_1 @ $eq)=(epred2_1 @ $eq))|((epred5_1 @ $eq)!=(epred4_1 @ $eq))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]), c_0_15]), c_0_16])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, (((epred2_1 @ $eq)=(epred1_1 @ $eq))|((epred5_1 @ $eq)!=(epred4_1 @ $eq))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]), c_0_15]), c_0_16])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred5_1 @ X1))|(((X1 @ epred7_0 @ epred8_0))=(($true)))|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3]), c_0_4])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred5_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred2_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ epred7_0 @ epred8_0)|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ((epred5_1 @ $eq)!=(epred4_1 @ $eq)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21]), c_0_22])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred5_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ epred7_0 @ epred8_0)|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred5_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ (epred2_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1))|(((X1 @ epred7_0 @ epred8_0))=(($true)))|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3]), c_0_4])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, (((epred2_1 @ $eq)=(epred1_1 @ $eq))|((epred8_0)=(epred7_0))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_24]), c_0_25])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, (((epred8_0)=(epred7_0))|((epred3_1 @ $eq)!=(epred1_1 @ $eq))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_26]), c_0_25])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred5_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ (epred2_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ epred7_0 @ epred8_0)|~((X1 @ (epred6_1 @ X1) @ (epred6_1 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_1 @ $eq)=(epred1_1 @ $eq)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]), c_0_15]), c_0_16])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, ((epred3_1 @ $eq)!=(epred1_1 @ $eq)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]), c_0_15]), c_0_16])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, ((epred8_0)=(epred7_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_30]), c_0_31]), c_0_32]), c_0_25])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]), c_0_15]), c_0_16]), ['proof']).
0.21/0.50	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.21/0.50	# Parsed axioms                        : 1
0.21/0.50	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.21/0.50	# Initial clauses                      : 12
0.21/0.50	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
0.21/0.50	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 11
0.21/0.50	# Processed clauses                    : 84
0.21/0.50	# ...of these trivial                  : 4
0.21/0.50	# ...subsumed                          : 14
0.21/0.50	# ...remaining for further processing  : 66
0.21/0.50	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.21/0.50	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.21/0.50	# Backward-subsumed                    : 16
0.21/0.50	# Backward-rewritten                   : 8
0.21/0.50	# Generated clauses                    : 172
0.21/0.50	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 142
0.21/0.50	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.21/0.50	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.21/0.50	# Paramodulations                      : 14
0.21/0.50	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.21/0.50	# NegExts                              : 19
0.21/0.50	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.21/0.50	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.21/0.50	# Current number of processed clauses  : 17
0.21/0.50	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
0.21/0.50	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.21/0.50	#    Negative unit clauses             : 3
0.21/0.50	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 11
0.21/0.50	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 67
0.21/0.50	# ...number of literals in the above   : 238
0.21/0.50	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.21/0.50	# Current number of archived clauses   : 49
0.21/0.50	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 105
0.21/0.50	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 42
0.21/0.50	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 12
0.21/0.50	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
0.21/0.50	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.21/0.50	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
0.21/0.50	# BW rewrite match successes           : 2
0.21/0.50	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.21/0.50	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.21/0.50	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 17572
0.21/0.50	
0.21/0.50	# -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.50	# User time                : 0.016 s
0.21/0.50	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.21/0.50	# Total time               : 0.017 s
0.21/0.50	# Maximum resident set size: 1956 pages
0.21/0.50	
0.21/0.50	# -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.50	# User time                : 0.018 s
0.21/0.50	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.21/0.50	# Total time               : 0.020 s
0.21/0.50	# Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
0.21/0.50	EOF
